Hidden cameras in the workplace have managed to get less complicated for the company administration to sort the bad apples within the good ones. The former are personnel who pull the office down due to their unproductive habits and lack of ability to meet up with ethical work standards. However surveillance runs the risk of pushing the relationship among the managers as well as workers. They impact on the morale of everyone else at work as well as issues of trust are brought to the surface. The real question is: are monitoring devices really worth the investment? Using spy cameras at work has become an alternative as well as contemporary way of evidence searching. Although these solve a lot of workspace issues with more expediency, their mere usage is what gives rise to personnel resentment. At what degree is the utilization of security cameras permissible? Regardless of the countless benefits that they give the implementation of regulations, are they definitely what a business requires? A controversy in 2002 highlighted the usage of concealed cameras in the office. It involved two women workers who found the claimed cameras in their areas. Abigail Hernandez and Maria Lopez, office manager as well as administrative associate, respectively, were both personnel of Pasadena’s Hillsides Children’s Center. The center generally holds children who were subjects of mistreatment. In his desire to get a culprit, Executive Director John Hitchcock said to setting up hidden cameras in the center. His steps were dependent on his concern for assuring legitimate business operations. To enforce his aim, he positioned hidden cameras at work to know who was seeing adult materials on Lopez’s computer right after office hours. In spite of the vehement reactions of the 2 women, the court favored Hitchcock, arguing that he had valid reasons for using such solution. While privacy is a main matter in this case, one can’t ruin the role of center heads or company owners as protectors of their very own turf. It comes as a natural task of those individuals to put the interest of many people initially as opposed to the concerns of the few.